(UNEMAT/Inglês 2018) Observe os conectivos therefore, so, even if, such as, however, e assinale

(UNEMAT/Inglês 2018) Observe os conectivos  therefore, so, even if, such as, however,  e assinale a alternativa correta sobre a função que e...

(UNEMAT/Inglês 2018) Observe os conectivos therefore, so, even if, such as, however, e assinale a alternativa correta sobre a função que eles assumem, respectivamente, no texto.

(A) Conclusão, concordância, contraste, exemplificação, contraste.

(B) Contraste, conclusão, conexão lógica, exemplificação, conclusão.

(C) Conclusão, conclusão, contraste, exemplificação, contraste.

(D) Conexão lógica, concordância, conexão lógica, exemplificação, contraste.

(E) Exemplificação, conclusão, conclusão, conexão lógica, contraste.

CONFIRA O TEXTO BASE DA QUESTÃO:

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AMERICAN AND BRITISH

VERSIONS OF HARRY POTTER SERIES

Philosopher’s vs. Sorcerer

When Scholastic was publishing Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone in America, they decided to rename the book Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone. They claimed that the American and British uses of the word philosopher were a bit different, so therefore sorcerer was a more appropriate word. Any true Harry Potter fan, American or British, Australian or Hungarian, I’m sure will agree with MuggleMix when we say that decision should not have been made the reasons are:

1) J.K. Rowling said so therefore it must be true. She says that if she was in a better position, she would have disagreed at the time.

2) It belittles Americans, making it seem as if they do not understand what the word “philosopher” means. Americans are smarter than that.

3) Sorcerer is unspecific. The stone could have belonged to anybody with magical powers in the book. But the British name defines who the stone belongs to and gives the name an entirely different meaning. Sorcerer is a very different word to philosopher.

4) The stone is referred to as the “Philosopher’s Stone” throughout J.K. Rowling’s original version, never the “Sorcerer’s Stone”, so why should the most central object of the book be labeled something completely different in the book title, even if its just being published in a different place?

5) How is the word “philosopher” in Britain different from the word “sorcerer” in America?

6) Philosopher’s Stone is actually a historical object that people used to search for, while the Sorcerer’s Stone has no factual background in real life.
Ah well…
Other terminology

There are some other minor changes that occurred in case Americans got confused. Some ones, such as turning “mum” into “mom” and “trainers” into “sneakers”, J.K. Rowling refused to let happen. However, she allowed some changes to be made that, if they were not made, would befuddle the readers:

UK: Skip – US: Dumpster
UK: Minister for Magic – US: Minister of Magic
[…]
UK: Car park – US: Parking lot
[…]

Disponível em http://w w w .fanpop.com/clubs/harrypotter/articles/4309/title/difference-between-american-british-versions-harry-potter-series. Acesso em nov. 2015.

QUESTÃO ANTERIOR:
- (UNIMAT/Espanhol 2018) Na sequência Pero el diablo también [...], a conjunção sublinhada pode ser substituída, sem comprometer o sentido, por

RESPOSTA:
(C) Conclusão, conclusão, contraste, exemplificação, contraste.

PRÓXIMA QUESTÃO:
- (UNIMAT/Inglês 2018) Com base no texto, analise as afirmativas.