(FGV-SP 2020) According to the information in the article

THE LEOPOLD MUSEUM By Thomas Trenkler Numerous important art collectors lived in Vienna until Adolf Hitler seized power in March 1938. ...

THE LEOPOLD MUSEUM

By Thomas Trenkler

Numerous important art collectors lived in Vienna until Adolf Hitler seized power in March 1938. The most important among them were Alphonse Rothschild, Prince Franz Josef II of Liechtenstein, the industrial magnate Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer, the librettist Fritz Grünbaum as well as the dentist Heinrich Rieger, who treated the destitute Egon Schiele in exchange for pictures. All of them were forced to emigrate or were murdered in the concentration camps. The tradition of upper-middle-class patronage was generally not continued after World War II, and few new private collectors emerged. Among those who did, Rudolf Leopold stood out from the rest. By the mid-1980s, his collection – primarily Austrian art from the Biedermeier period (1815-1848) to Expressionism (the early decades of the 20th century) – highlighted the deficiencies of the Austrian state collections.

Rudolf Leopold was born in Vienna in 1925, studied medicine in the post-war years, received his medical degree in 1953, and finally specialized in ophthalmology. In 1947 he began to attend lectures on art history and to collect works of the 19th century. At an auction [leilão] in 1950, he happened upon [encontrou por acaso] a forgotten catalogue of Egon Schiele’s works, which had been published by the art dealer Otto Kallir-Nirenstein. Until 1938, Kallir-Nirenstein had exhibited at his Neue Gallerie pictures by the most important Austrian artists of the modern period. Rudolf Leopold was excited by the radical visual language of Schiele (1890-1918), whose art had been labeled “pornographic" in his own day. Leopold cared little about the lack of interest that the international art world showed for Schiele and the disparaging [de menosprezo] opinion that most art historians held of his work. He acquired practically every work of Schiele he could lay his hands on.

Leopold’s passion for collecting, which his wife Elizabeth shared, grew ever larger, bordering on fanaticism. In addition, he expanded the focus of his collection to Jugendstil, an Austrian art period that flowered from the end of World War I until just after World War II. Leopold took out considerable bank loans, offering masterpieces in his collection as collateral. His spacious home in the Viennese suburb of Grinzing slowly turned into an art warehouse. Thousands of drawings were stored on cabinets and under beds, and multiple layers of paintings leaned against the walls. Because his house was filled far beyond capacity and the mountain of debt had assumed dangerous levels, Leopold considered selling his collection to the Republic of Austria. In March 1989, on the occasion of the groundbreaking exhibition “Egon Schiele and his Time,” Chancellor [chief minister of the Austrian state] Franz Vranitzky announced that negotiations for the acquisition of the collection would begin.

For a long time the negotiations failed to produce a satisfying result: Leopold’s expectations far exceeded the amount that had been considered by the government. Furthermore, Leopold was unwilling to have his collection added to the holdings of a museum of Austrian modern art, demanding instead that his life’s work be preserved as a distinct whole. Hans Dichand, the publisher of the newspaper Kronen Zeitung, turned out to be a powerful ally. The widely read daily repeatedly called for the purchase of the collection.

However, in 1992 the Kronen Zeitung, together with the Freedom Party, launched a huge campaign against the government’s planned construction of the MuseumsQuartier complex, which, even with downsizing, seemed too expensive. But Erhard Busek, then the minister of science, solved the impasse by linking the two projects: in October 1993 the government announced that it would establish a separate Leopold Museum within the MuseumsQuartier, which thus, to a certain extent, owes its existence to Rudolf Leopold. Since he had insisted on a new building for his vast collection, even the Kronen Zeitung had to accept Busek’s solution.

In the early summer of 1994, after more bargaining, Leopold agreed to transfer his entire collection to a foundation and, in return, to receive 160 million euros in a series of annual, indexed partial payments until May 2007. And in September 2001, scarcely three months after the official opening of the MuseumsQuartier, the Leopold Museum opened as well.

Adapted from the book The Vienna Hofburg.

QUESTÃO 44
(FGV-SP 2020) According to the information in the article,

A) at the last minute, the Kronen Zeitung newspaper reversed itself and announced its opposition to the planned MuseumsQuartier.

B) at first, the Austrian government planned to build the Leopold Museum outside the MuseumsQuartier.

C) if Rudolf Leopold had not insisted on a separate building for his art collection, the MuseumsQuartier might never have become a reality.

D) Although Erhard Busek was the minister of science, he also possessed ample knowledge and understanding of fine art and architecture.

E) the excellent personal relationship between Rudolf Leopold and Hans Dichand was fundamental in guaranteeing the construction of the MuseumsQuartier and the Leopold Museum.

QUESTÃO ANTERIOR:
- (FGV-SP 2020) Which of the following is most likely one reason that, as mentioned in paragraph 4, “…the negotiations failed to produce a satisfying result“?

RESOLUÇÃO (Colégio Objetivo):
Lê-se no texto:
In October 1993 the government announced that it would establish a separate Leopold Museum within the MuseumsQuartier, which thus, to a certain extent, owes its existence to Rudolf Leopold. Since he had insisted on a new building for his vast collection, even the Kronen Zeitung had to accept Busek’s solution.

GABARITO:
C) if Rudolf Leopold had not insisted on a separate building for his art collection, the MuseumsQuartier might never have become a reality.

PRÓXIMA QUESTÃO:
- (FGV-SP 2020) With respect to the story of the art collector Rudolf Leopold, the information in the article most likely supports which of the following statements?

QUESTÃO DISPONÍVEL EM:
- Prova FGV-SP 2020 (Administração) com Gabarito e Resolução